melloyellow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 07:08:58 PM |
|
1. You are correct. 2. In my tests I used geth.exe --rpc --rpcaddr "192.168.0.2" --rpcport 8545 thanks - this is major thing in solo mining because we can solo mine without using the need of a proxy solution - if only I can turn back the clock 6 months ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You could always solo mine without a proxy....
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 07:17:38 PM |
|
Claymore, you told some time ago that you planing implement json based remote monitoring feature for you miner, how things are going ?
I PM-ed you a build that sends hashrate in solo mode, does it work for you? I think monitoring will be available in next version, it will be ready in a few days. Thanks a lot. Sorry i forgot about PM's. Yes it works.
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 07:35:20 PM |
|
Claymore, you told some time ago that you planing implement json based remote monitoring feature for you miner, how things are going ?
I PM-ed you a build that sends hashrate in solo mode, does it work for you? I think monitoring will be available in next version, it will be ready in a few days. What about the Stratum-Stratum proxy you said you will have in couple of days? this is the only thing putting us off using Claymore. BTW: I would also appreciate if you have Linux builds.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 07:59:28 PM |
|
Claymore, you told some time ago that you planing implement json based remote monitoring feature for you miner, how things are going ?
I PM-ed you a build that sends hashrate in solo mode, does it work for you? I think monitoring will be available in next version, it will be ready in a few days. What about the Stratum-Stratum proxy you said you will have in couple of days? this is the only thing putting us off using Claymore. BTW: I would also appreciate if you have Linux builds. I decided not to do a proxy, at least not right now. Proxy has two advantages: 1. You can easiliy change the pool list, it will be applied for all rigs. Option "send pool list to all rigs" will be available in the monitoring utility that I will release in a few days. 2. You can get less data traffic and reduce pool load. But you will not see rigs on pool, only one proxy will be showed there. Data size is not important for 99% of people, but everyone wants to see detailed stats on pool. Also proxy must support all stratum versions and convert them into some one stratum version that miners will use. Possible but requires time to implement. So I decided to release an utility that can monitor miners and manage their settings, but it will not be a proxy, at least first version. You can argue, I'm ready for feedbacks.
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 08:03:32 PM |
|
Claymore, you told some time ago that you planing implement json based remote monitoring feature for you miner, how things are going ?
I PM-ed you a build that sends hashrate in solo mode, does it work for you? I think monitoring will be available in next version, it will be ready in a few days. What about the Stratum-Stratum proxy you said you will have in couple of days? this is the only thing putting us off using Claymore. BTW: I would also appreciate if you have Linux builds. I decided not to do a proxy, at least not right now. Proxy has two advantages: 1. You can easiliy change the pool list, it will be applied for all rigs. Option "send pool list to all rigs" will be available in the monitoring utility that I will release in a few days. 2. You can get less data traffic and reduce pool load. But you will not see rigs on pool, only one proxy will be showed there. Data size is not important for 99% of people, but everyone wants to see detailed stats on pool. Also proxy must support all stratum versions and convert them into some one stratum version that miners will use. Possible but requires time to implement. So I decided to release an utility that can monitor miners and manage their settings, but it will not be a proxy, at least first version. You can argue, I'm ready for feedbacks. Actually thats what I was asking about, so can I get a test version maybe ? Otherwise I need to discuss something with you, can you PM me please?
|
|
|
|
Bojcha
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 08:27:42 PM |
|
Does "-etht" also work for stratum pool mode or just solo?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 09:24:23 PM |
|
Does "-etht" also work for stratum pool mode or just solo?
From readme: ... -etht Time period between Ethereum HTTP requests for new job in solo mode, in milliseconds. Default value is 200ms. ... I think it is clear that it is for solo mode only.
|
|
|
|
tlmoscow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 09:40:04 PM |
|
2. You can get less data traffic and reduce pool load.
If you have 20 rigs in remote site working thru 3G connection it could be vital
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 09:45:30 PM |
|
2. You can get less data traffic and reduce pool load.
If you have 20 rigs in remote site working thru 3G connection it could be vital Ok, you can use eth-proxy for now, v4.2 can work with proxies, though I did not test it much. I still think that using proxy can cause some problems and additional delays, but probably in some cases it can be the only solution.
|
|
|
|
elzium
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 10:17:05 PM |
|
Is it possible to solo mine without the hole blockchain in local machine but just an address in exchange? As i see it, only the current info is needed for calculations, not all 10+GB?
|
|
|
|
frostminer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 10:19:39 PM |
|
2. You can get less data traffic and reduce pool load.
If you have 20 rigs in remote site working thru 3G connection it could be vital If you have 20 rigs at a remote location ... you could probably also afford a usable connection ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) (but i do agree.. optimalization at all stages)
|
|
|
|
Alehandros
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 10:50:44 PM |
|
Installed and running in minutes without a hitch!
...nice job on the console readouts btw
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2016, 11:14:36 PM |
|
1. You are correct. 2. In my tests I used geth.exe --rpc --rpcaddr "192.168.0.2" --rpcport 8545 thanks - this is major thing in solo mining because we can solo mine without using the need of a proxy solution - if only I can turn back the clock 6 months ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You could always solo mine without a proxy.... If local mode solo mining (ie. 1 PC solo mining Geth instance in same PC) then no need proxy. What I meant was MANY rigs pointing to Geth directly without the need of a proxy. CDM can do this - and that IMO gives reduces variances and delays, technically faster solo mining. Until the existence of Claymore's v4.2, the only "many workers/rigs" solo mining solution was using a proxy solution (ie. Dwarfpool, Sammy007 etc) to aggregate many workers/rigs hash streams into one steady stream using a proxy server, because the standard ethminer, vanilla or genoil's version are not designed to work with Stratum based Eth pools. Qtminer however works with Stratum based Eth pools - but that's about it - CDM has more features. This is my understanding. Appreciate if any experts out there can verify. thanks
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
melloyellow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:12:41 AM |
|
1. You are correct. 2. In my tests I used geth.exe --rpc --rpcaddr "192.168.0.2" --rpcport 8545 thanks - this is major thing in solo mining because we can solo mine without using the need of a proxy solution - if only I can turn back the clock 6 months ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You could always solo mine without a proxy.... If local mode solo mining (ie. 1 PC solo mining Geth instance in same PC) then no need proxy. What I meant was MANY rigs pointing to Geth directly without the need of a proxy. CDM can do this - and that IMO gives reduces variances and delays, technically faster solo mining. Until the existence of Claymore's v4.2, the only "many workers/rigs" solo mining solution was using a proxy solution (ie. Dwarfpool, Sammy007 etc) to aggregate many workers/rigs hash streams into one steady stream using a proxy server, because the standard ethminer, vanilla or genoil's version are not designed to work with Stratum based Eth pools. Qtminer however works with Stratum based Eth pools - but that's about it - CDM has more features. This is my understanding. Appreciate if any experts out there can verify. thanks You could do the "many workers/rigs" solo mining with the other miners as well since the beginning. Using Claymore's example, just point your rigs at 192.168.0.2:8545 and you're solo mining. Sammy's proxy gave a nice interface to monitor the solo mining however. You don't need stratum to solo mine, the latency between your rigs and the geth instance is going to be so small it doesn't matter (if you're on the same lan). Stratum is great for mining at pools because instead of your miner asking if there's a new block every X ms, the pool tells your miner there is a new block. Much more efficient.
|
|
|
|
melloyellow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 12:26:44 AM |
|
Claymore can you mine to miningpoolhub with only -esm 0 and the 20536 port? That port corresponds to dwarf proxy implementation. I tried to mine to the 20535 port using -esm 2 and it didn't work. That's the coinotron proxy implementation. Curious, as I've seen the miningpoolhub op say that's the best way to connect to his pool.
Also your example in the first post regarding miningpoolhub does not have the -allpools 1 parameter
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 01:07:03 AM |
|
1. You are correct. 2. In my tests I used geth.exe --rpc --rpcaddr "192.168.0.2" --rpcport 8545 thanks - this is major thing in solo mining because we can solo mine without using the need of a proxy solution - if only I can turn back the clock 6 months ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You could always solo mine without a proxy.... If local mode solo mining (ie. 1 PC solo mining Geth instance in same PC) then no need proxy. What I meant was MANY rigs pointing to Geth directly without the need of a proxy. CDM can do this - and that IMO gives reduces variances and delays, technically faster solo mining. Until the existence of Claymore's v4.2, the only "many workers/rigs" solo mining solution was using a proxy solution (ie. Dwarfpool, Sammy007 etc) to aggregate many workers/rigs hash streams into one steady stream using a proxy server, because the standard ethminer, vanilla or genoil's version are not designed to work with Stratum based Eth pools. Qtminer however works with Stratum based Eth pools - but that's about it - CDM has more features. This is my understanding. Appreciate if any experts out there can verify. thanks You could do the "many workers/rigs" solo mining with the other miners as well since the beginning. Using Claymore's example, just point your rigs at 192.168.0.2:8545 and you're solo mining. Sammy's proxy gave a nice interface to monitor the solo mining however. You don't need stratum to solo mine, the latency between your rigs and the geth instance is going to be so small it doesn't matter (if you're on the same lan). Stratum is great for mining at pools because instead of your miner asking if there's a new block every X ms, the pool tells your miner there is a new block. Much more efficient. ok good info - appreciate it melloyellow
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
woodbery
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 04:44:23 AM Last edit: May 12, 2016, 05:08:04 AM by woodbery |
|
my miner allways say avaible card 0 no card in the list
i use v4.2 windows 10 16gb virtual memory all variable is set correcly... all hardware in device manager is detected... anyone have a idea of my problem?
my gpu is 4X r9 290 with driver 15.2 firewall is off.. tryed everything.. i dont understand
11:58:56:821 418 Cards available: 0 11:58:56:826 418 No cards in the list!
can someone help me please?
|
|
|
|
ExcelThroughKnowledge
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 05:54:24 AM |
|
my miner allways say avaible card 0 no card in the list
i use v4.2 windows 10 16gb virtual memory all variable is set correcly... all hardware in device manager is detected... anyone have a idea of my problem?
my gpu is 4X r9 290 with driver 15.2 firewall is off.. tryed everything.. i dont understand
11:58:56:821 418 Cards available: 0 11:58:56:826 418 No cards in the list!
can someone help me please?
you checked them with device manager already? Are you using on board graphics to boot your com?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 09:25:20 AM |
|
Claymore can you mine to miningpoolhub with only -esm 0 and the 20536 port? That port corresponds to dwarf proxy implementation. I tried to mine to the 20535 port using -esm 2 and it didn't work. That's the coinotron proxy implementation. Curious, as I've seen the miningpoolhub op say that's the best way to connect to his pool.
Also your example in the first post regarding miningpoolhub does not have the -allpools 1 parameter
This works for me: EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool us-east1.ethereum.miningpoolhub.com:20536 -ewal 0x...walletaddress.... -eworker YOURLOGIN.YOURWORKERNAME -epsw x -allpools 1 But you must create same worker on this pool, and perhaps specify same wallet address in account settings on pool (I don't remember). About missed "-allpools 1": you are correct, I updated OP.
|
|
|
|
tolazy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 12, 2016, 09:36:27 AM |
|
today when i woke up i saw that the CDM window was closed no error message dont know if it tried to restart or not
EthDcrMiner64.exe -mode 1 -epool eth-eu.dwarfpool.com:8008 -ewal 0x0/gpu1 -epsw x -dpool stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:2252 -dwal tolazy.dcr -dpsw x -dcri 65
dont use dcr rather have the gpu OC for eth.
anyone else have seen this error? CDM 4.2 windows 390x @ 1160Mhz only 80MHz OC powerlimit +50
core volt +25 default +19
getting 33.1Mhs
|
|
|
|
|