Bitcoin Forum
December 08, 2016, 02:25:09 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 [605] 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 ... 830 »
  Print  
Author Topic: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2  (Read 4822237 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 24, 2013, 11:34:59 PM

Trying to run cgminer to mine Litecoin with Kattare pool on an NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti and getting the following error with these BAT file settings:
For Litecoin try cudaMiner:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
It's way faster on Nvidia cards.
Oh, no - please don't mention a different miner in this thread!  Kano will post a 10 paragraph reply accusing you of being a shill who is just advertising for that crapminer you mentioned.  Roll Eyes
A miner that adds features that CGMiner does not have is not a bad thing. A miner that copies CGMiner and then claims that CGMiner is inferior in every imaginable way is something that Kano does not seem to take lightly. See the difference? Wink

I don't care about the difference.  When a user posts a bug report and happens to mention that the problem does not occur with some other mining software, that user does not deserve to be attacked, and the report ignored just because Kano has personal issues with another developer.

No.

As I stated in the reply before, the logic you presented was complete fail.

Something didn't work for you with program A whatever you did wrong.

So you ran program Bleargh on another operating system with a different configuration.

Even a inept fool should be able to see the logic fail there.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
1481163909
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481163909

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481163909
Reply with quote  #2

1481163909
Report to moderator
1481163909
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481163909

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481163909
Reply with quote  #2

1481163909
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481163909
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481163909

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481163909
Reply with quote  #2

1481163909
Report to moderator
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 941



View Profile
August 25, 2013, 03:25:39 AM

Trying to run cgminer to mine Litecoin with Kattare pool on an NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti and getting the following error with these BAT file settings:
For Litecoin try cudaMiner:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
It's way faster on Nvidia cards.
Oh, no - please don't mention a different miner in this thread!  Kano will post a 10 paragraph reply accusing you of being a shill who is just advertising for that crapminer you mentioned.  Roll Eyes
A miner that adds features that CGMiner does not have is not a bad thing. A miner that copies CGMiner and then claims that CGMiner is inferior in every imaginable way is something that Kano does not seem to take lightly. See the difference? Wink

I don't care about the difference.  When a user posts a bug report and happens to mention that the problem does not occur with some other mining software, that user does not deserve to be attacked, and the report ignored just because Kano has personal issues with another developer.

No.

As I stated in the reply before, the logic you presented was complete fail.

Something didn't work for you with program A whatever you did wrong.

So you ran program Bleargh on another operating system with a different configuration.

Even a inept fool should be able to see the logic fail there.

It's not clear to me what "logic" you are referring to.

I simply reported a problem I had with CGMiner using the official release binaries on Windows 7 x64.  I then pointed out that I did not have this problem when NOT using the official release binaries of CGMiner on Windows 7 x64.

There was no logical implication, just a report that something that was known to work in a different configuration did NOT work when using the official release binary distribution of CGMiner on Windows7 x64.  End of report.

The right thing for you to do would be to simply apologize and admit that you flew off the handle because I inadvertently mentioned a topic that apparently is a hot-button for you.  I did not intend to bait you, and you will notice that I have refrained, out of courtesy to you, from further mention of that specific topic.





Libertarians:  Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
Xian01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302


󮀓1刎


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 04:44:45 AM

Trying to run cgminer to mine Litecoin with Kattare pool on an NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti and getting the following error with these BAT file settings:
For Litecoin try cudaMiner:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
It's way faster on Nvidia cards.
Oh, no - please don't mention a different miner in this thread!  Kano will post a 10 paragraph reply accusing you of being a shill who is just advertising for that crapminer you mentioned.  Roll Eyes
A miner that adds features that CGMiner does not have is not a bad thing. A miner that copies CGMiner and then claims that CGMiner is inferior in every imaginable way is something that Kano does not seem to take lightly. See the difference? Wink

I don't care about the difference.  When a user posts a bug report and happens to mention that the problem does not occur with some other mining software, that user does not deserve to be attacked, and the report ignored just because Kano has personal issues with another developer.

No.

As I stated in the reply before, the logic you presented was complete fail.

Something didn't work for you with program A whatever you did wrong.

So you ran program Bleargh on another operating system with a different configuration.

Even a inept fool should be able to see the logic fail there.

Kano, you need to chill out dude. You're a tremendous douche-bag at times. No need for that unless you are applying for a job at Butterfly Labs.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2013, 05:25:22 AM

I'm unable to compile 3.4.0 on Mac OS X:

Code:
util.c: In function 慶gtimer_time:
util.c:891: warning: implicit declaration of function 慶lock_gettime
util.c:891: error: 慍LOCK_MONOTONIC undeclared (first use in this function)
util.c:891: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
util.c:891: error: for each function it appears in.)
util.c: In function 憂anosleep_abstime:
util.c:899: warning: implicit declaration of function 慶lock_nanosleep
util.c:899: error: 慍LOCK_MONOTONIC undeclared (first use in this function)
util.c:899: error: 慣IMER_ABSTIME undeclared (first use in this function)

Seems like clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ...) is not available on OS X.
Yay for more unimplemented POSIX features on an operating system that claims to be POSIX. More like POSOSX.

Will create a generic workaround for the next version.
If you can build from git and you're on OSX, try building now as I've added a generic workaround for this.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Karin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109



View Profile WWW
August 25, 2013, 06:32:50 AM

If you can build from git and you're on OSX, try building now as I've added a generic workaround for this.

Cool!  Thanks for doing this.  I get this when compiling now:

Code:
util.c: In function 慶gtimer_time:
util.c:1017: error: 憈s undeclared (first use in this function)

Easiest to use bitcoin/litecoin miner for Mac: AsteroidApp.com | @AsteroidApp | Bitcointalk forum thread
Unofficial cgminer for Mac OS X | sgminer for Mac OS X
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2013, 06:34:45 AM

If you can build from git and you're on OSX, try building now as I've added a generic workaround for this.

Cool!  Thanks for doing this.  I get this when compiling now:

Code:
util.c: In function 慶gtimer_time:
util.c:1017: error: 憈s undeclared (first use in this function)
Thanks. git pull and try again please (I'm coding blind!)

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
monstrs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 469



View Profile
August 25, 2013, 07:13:01 AM

For the brave (and very few) BFL SC single owners out there that wish to flash your devices to try and get the last bit of hashrate out of them, I have uploaded 3 different compiled firmwares here:

http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/BitForce_SC/BitForce_SC_1.2.6ck.zip

They all try to enable extra engines than the default firmware does, but in addition I have made 3 different speed ones available, they're tagged 7,8 and 9.

I suggest you start with the 7 first, and if your HW error% rate is less than 2%, try the next one up. I have two singles and one worked best with the 7 version while the other with the 9, so each device will be different.

Remember to put the pins right when connecting your AVR dragon to flash it, and note the different device that Amtel Studio tells you the single is (compared to the Jalapeno) and change your settings accordingly.

If you don't know what the hell I'm talking about, then just ignore this message, since it assumes lots of prior knowledge about flashing the Jalapeno.

any chance that it could work on Little single?
Askit2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 524


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 10:42:41 AM

Trying to run cgminer to mine Litecoin with Kattare pool on an NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti and getting the following error with these BAT file settings:
For Litecoin try cudaMiner:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
It's way faster on Nvidia cards.
Oh, no - please don't mention a different miner in this thread!  Kano will post a 10 paragraph reply accusing you of being a shill who is just advertising for that crapminer you mentioned.  Roll Eyes
A miner that adds features that CGMiner does not have is not a bad thing. A miner that copies CGMiner and then claims that CGMiner is inferior in every imaginable way is something that Kano does not seem to take lightly. See the difference? Wink

I don't care about the difference.  When a user posts a bug report and happens to mention that the problem does not occur with some other mining software, that user does not deserve to be attacked, and the report ignored just because Kano has personal issues with another developer.

No.

As I stated in the reply before, the logic you presented was complete fail.

Something didn't work for you with program A whatever you did wrong.

So you ran program Bleargh on another operating system with a different configuration.

Even a inept fool should be able to see the logic fail there.

Kano, you need to chill out dude. You're a tremendous douche-bag at times. No need for that unless you are applying for a job at Butterfly Labs.

Maybe I missed where the OP of the complaint stated that he tried compiling on windows, or compiled CGminer on Linux. Re-reading it a few times I noted the OP had only stated trying the binary release on windows. Not compiling, not an older version, not switching to Linux.

What the OP did was shortly after posting a problem that could be A) windows related, B) cgminer software related or C) hardware related the OP posted that switching the OS to Linux, the software to another software that the problem disappeared. As far as I know the OP of the complaint switched hardware too as I am not seeing where the OP had gone to the trouble of reformatting to run Linux. So sure by changing everything but the block erupters I can assure you the problem was not directly the block erupters. But as far as a bug in cgminer I think maybe a little more stringent diagnostic procedure is required to have a guess at that.

To be honest I can assure you using less shortcuts on the same testing strategy months before I had issues with CGminer on windows. All timeout related. Even increasing the timeout (Kano did it to try to fix the problem) there was nothing fixing that version. I could have stratum on eclipse or far lower errors on cgminer rolling back to an older version. I did build on windows from kano's git. I did try other things. I finally ordered a Raspberry pi compiled the newest cgminer (at the time) and suddenly the errors went away. Same version I wanted to run on windows just on Linux. Now unfortunately the problem could be A) the computer I used to use, or B) the operating system. Since I could run the previous version without issues without the hardware errors the problem wasn't directly with my hardware. There was a compatibility issue with the timer in windows not being accurate enough. Since I could keep the CGminer version the same on both I could prove that cgminer itself wasn't the issue. If the timeouts had been caused by cgminers lower latency on that version it would apply to the much slower raspberry pi with even lower latency on linux.

Now given that level or more of testing I would say maybe the OP had a bug. Given the information posted either the OP didn't test anything or forgot to mention any tests the ran to try to track down the error. Maybe there is a bug. But is the bug with windows, cgminer or the OP's hardware? I can't answer that. No one can off of the information provided.

I am sure they are looking for the bug right now. Given a little more information maybe they will know where to look for the bug. To me it seems better to ask what would help them find the bug that was so bothersome. Maybe hold other variables still while changing only one at a time so as to narrow down the possibilities.

I have reported bugs here. I have been met with no real hostility by anyone. I just ask how to fix whatever error I was having. I let them know what versions the error hadn't shown up on until. By doing that at least the places to look for the bug is limited to the changes between the last known good version and  the current version

I appreciate donations at ( 1NwkQdmomQPLtdes5KuZhB1D22p7ZGRy4p )
If I am helping in the CGMiner thread give it to Con or Kano. They do the work there.
If you want to sign up for a coinbase account I would appreciate it if you use my referral link. US people now wire, 1% fee give or take a little for sending to your bank account. https://coinbase.com/?r=515bf6145682db9d11000028&utm_campaign=user-referral&src=
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 11:10:44 AM

...
Kano, you need to chill out dude. You're a tremendous douche-bag at times. No need for that unless you are applying for a job at Butterfly Labs.
Fuck off Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 941



View Profile
August 25, 2013, 12:35:59 PM

Trying to run cgminer to mine Litecoin with Kattare pool on an NVIDIA GTX 550 Ti and getting the following error with these BAT file settings:
For Litecoin try cudaMiner:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
It's way faster on Nvidia cards.
Oh, no - please don't mention a different miner in this thread!  Kano will post a 10 paragraph reply accusing you of being a shill who is just advertising for that crapminer you mentioned.  Roll Eyes
A miner that adds features that CGMiner does not have is not a bad thing. A miner that copies CGMiner and then claims that CGMiner is inferior in every imaginable way is something that Kano does not seem to take lightly. See the difference? Wink

I don't care about the difference.  When a user posts a bug report and happens to mention that the problem does not occur with some other mining software, that user does not deserve to be attacked, and the report ignored just because Kano has personal issues with another developer.

No.

As I stated in the reply before, the logic you presented was complete fail.

Something didn't work for you with program A whatever you did wrong.

So you ran program Bleargh on another operating system with a different configuration.

Even a inept fool should be able to see the logic fail there.

Kano, you need to chill out dude. You're a tremendous douche-bag at times. No need for that unless you are applying for a job at Butterfly Labs.

Maybe I missed where the OP of the complaint stated that he tried compiling on windows, or compiled CGminer on Linux. Re-reading it a few times I noted the OP had only stated trying the binary release on windows. Not compiling, not an older version, not switching to Linux.

What the OP did was shortly after posting a problem that could be A) windows related, B) cgminer software related or C) hardware related the OP posted that switching the OS to Linux, the software to another software that the problem disappeared. As far as I know the OP of the complaint switched hardware too as I am not seeing where the OP had gone to the trouble of reformatting to run Linux. So sure by changing everything but the block erupters I can assure you the problem was not directly the block erupters. But as far as a bug in cgminer I think maybe a little more stringent diagnostic procedure is required to have a guess at that.

To be honest I can assure you using less shortcuts on the same testing strategy months before I had issues with CGminer on windows. All timeout related. Even increasing the timeout (Kano did it to try to fix the problem) there was nothing fixing that version. I could have stratum on eclipse or far lower errors on cgminer rolling back to an older version. I did build on windows from kano's git. I did try other things. I finally ordered a Raspberry pi compiled the newest cgminer (at the time) and suddenly the errors went away. Same version I wanted to run on windows just on Linux. Now unfortunately the problem could be A) the computer I used to use, or B) the operating system. Since I could run the previous version without issues without the hardware errors the problem wasn't directly with my hardware. There was a compatibility issue with the timer in windows not being accurate enough. Since I could keep the CGminer version the same on both I could prove that cgminer itself wasn't the issue. If the timeouts had been caused by cgminers lower latency on that version it would apply to the much slower raspberry pi with even lower latency on linux.

Now given that level or more of testing I would say maybe the OP had a bug. Given the information posted either the OP didn't test anything or forgot to mention any tests the ran to try to track down the error. Maybe there is a bug. But is the bug with windows, cgminer or the OP's hardware? I can't answer that. No one can off of the information provided.

I am sure they are looking for the bug right now. Given a little more information maybe they will know where to look for the bug. To me it seems better to ask what would help them find the bug that was so bothersome. Maybe hold other variables still while changing only one at a time so as to narrow down the possibilities.

I have reported bugs here. I have been met with no real hostility by anyone. I just ask how to fix whatever error I was having. I let them know what versions the error hadn't shown up on until. By doing that at least the places to look for the bug is limited to the changes between the last known good version and  the current version

All this might be applicable, if my goal was to troubleshoot CGMiner.  It was not.  My goal was to get my mining hardware mining reliably.  I tried one configuration, which happened to be a very generic install of the release distribution of CGMiner, and I had problems with that configuration.  I then tried a different configuration that worked 100%.  I'm done, my problem is solved.

I posted the problem that I had experienced here to alert the developers that there might be an issue, because I thought that was the right thing to do.  I would think that the information that a generic install of CGMiner appeared to have problems with Block Erupters might be worth knowing to the developers, and the fact that the same Block Erupters worked perfectly in another configuration was just included to demonstrate that there was no hardware problem involved.

Now, you can fairly say that that is not a very detailed bug report, and therefore of limited value to the developer.  I did not invest any time at all in trying to fix CGMiner, because my goal was just to get my hardware reliably making money ASAP, and I accomplished that.

That being said, I could understand if my post was answered with "Well, that's not really enough information for me to determine the problem you were having, and I cannot reproduce this failure, so I can't act on this report."

Instead, I was attacked as a SHILL, who was somehow ADVERTISING for a 'competitor'!  Does that not seems just a little over the top to you?

Maybe it wasn't the best bug report ever written, but I did not deserve the response I got.

Libertarians:  Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:26:52 PM

So by your own admission, the first part of your post was pretty much useless

...
Now, you can fairly say that that is not a very detailed bug report, and therefore of limited value to the developer.  I did not invest any time at all in trying to fix CGMiner, because my goal was just to get my hardware reliably making money ASAP, and I accomplished that.
...
But in case it wasn't obvious, it was not of limited value, it was of no value at all.
It works for others who do it correctly and read the READMEs, so your complete lack of any information at all says indeed the first half of your post was completely useless.

And the 2nd part of your post is saying to use another miner.

OK, it's worse than fail logic, it's a completely pointless post that only tells people to use another miner.

... and to top it off you're filling this thread up with big useless crap posts also ...

As I said at the start of this: Go away.

I will also point out something that you probably completely missed also ... that your USBs you have bought will never mine the amount of BTC you paid for them.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2013, 01:28:29 PM

* ckolivas groans

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:35:04 PM

I will also point out something that you probably completely missed also ... that your USBs you have bought will never mine the amount of BTC you paid for them.

Are you in the future telling business now?  You know for certain the value of BTC will never go above the current $120/USD? 

M

MMinerMonitor author, monitor/auto/schedule reboots/alerts/remote/MobileMiner for Ants and Spondoolies! Latest (5.2). MPoolMonitor author, monitor stats/workers for most pools, global BTC stats (current/nxt diff/USD val/hashrate/calc)! Latest (v4.2) 
Buyer beware of Bitmain hardware and services.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:50:53 PM

I will also point out something that you probably completely missed also ... that your USBs you have bought will never mine the amount of BTC you paid for them.

Are you in the future telling business now?  You know for certain the value of BTC will never go above the current $120/USD? 

M

... will never mine the amount of BTC you paid for them.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Xian01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302


󮀓1刎


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:52:12 PM

* ckolivas groans

Hey man, he's your partner... (Passive-aggressive smiley face)

xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 941



View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:52:42 PM

So by your own admission, the first part of your post was pretty much useless

...
Now, you can fairly say that that is not a very detailed bug report, and therefore of limited value to the developer.  I did not invest any time at all in trying to fix CGMiner, because my goal was just to get my hardware reliably making money ASAP, and I accomplished that.
...
But in case it wasn't obvious, it was not of limited value, it was of no value at all.
It works for others who do it correctly and read the READMEs, so your complete lack of any information at all says indeed the first half of your post was completely useless.

And the 2nd part of your post is saying to use another miner.

OK, it's worse than fail logic, it's a completely pointless post that only tells people to use another miner.

... and to top it off you're filling this thread up with big useless crap posts also ...

As I said at the start of this: Go away.

I will also point out something that you probably completely missed also ... that your USBs you have bought will never mine the amount of BTC you paid for them.

It was of NO value because instead of asking for more detail, you just attacked me irrationally, claiming I was advertising for your 'competition'.

I never instructed anyone to use any other miner.  I just stated what happened in my case.  I used configuration A, and it failed.  Then I used configuration B, and it worked 100 %.  End of story.


Libertarians:  Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
Xian01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302


󮀓1刎


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:57:38 PM

So by your own admission, the first part of your post was pretty much useless

...
Now, you can fairly say that that is not a very detailed bug report, and therefore of limited value to the developer.  I did not invest any time at all in trying to fix CGMiner, because my goal was just to get my hardware reliably making money ASAP, and I accomplished that.
...
But in case it wasn't obvious, it was not of limited value, it was of no value at all.
It works for others who do it correctly and read the READMEs, so your complete lack of any information at all says indeed the first half of your post was completely useless.

And the 2nd part of your post is saying to use another miner.

OK, it's worse than fail logic, it's a completely pointless post that only tells people to use another miner.

... and to top it off you're filling this thread up with big useless crap posts also ...

As I said at the start of this: Go away.
I will also point out something that you probably completely missed also ... that your USBs you have bought will never mine the amount of BTC you paid for them.
It was of NO value because instead of asking for more detail, you just attacked me irrationally, claiming I was advertising for your 'competition'.
I never instructed anyone to use any other miner.  I just stated what happened in my case.  I used configuration A, and it failed.  Then I used configuration B, and it worked 100 %.  End of story.

 As much as I loathe Luke-Jr, I'm tempted to try Bllllaaaarrrggghhhhminer on Windows to see if resolves a consistent crash issues after a couple days I'm having with CGMiner driving AMUs.

 Thanks Kano. Much like with Butterfly Labs, your terrible attitude has driven me to your competition.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 01:59:48 PM

...

 Thanks Kano. Much like with Butterfly Labs, your terrible attitude has driven me to your competition.

One less dick in this thread Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
HellDiverUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 02:05:56 PM

Yeah, well one mining program uses stupid USB drivers which need so many hoops to be jumped through to get working, if they do at all, for no apparent benefit. The author(s) refuse(s) to accept that changing to the new more difficult and stupid USB drivers was a mistake, and won't go back to the original "just works" way of doing things.  That miner also has issues compiling it's OGL kernel, crashing out instantly, unless the correct number of chickens are slaughtered while the moon is in the third quadrant and sacrificed to the SDK gods.  The issue is also ignored by the authors, and has been for months upon months.

The other needs one set of USB or GPU drivers installed and everything just works.


I won't say which one is which, but I think anyone reading this has a fair idea..

HellDiverUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 02:06:57 PM

...

 Thanks Kano. Much like with Butterfly Labs, your terrible attitude has driven me to your competition.

One less dick in this thread Smiley

Nah, the dick is still firmly embedded in the thread.  Right up to the balls.
Pages: « 1 ... 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 [605] 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 ... 830 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!