LeonManveli
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 08:39:42 AM |
|
Hi all! where is the SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.6.0 link? there are only old versions http://
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
doktor83
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 08:41:24 AM |
|
+ 'persistent_memory' parameter added to gpu_conf, basically what it does is tries to allocate some memory that is normally not available to the GPU. It can increase hashrate in some ocassions, by finding the right intensity and threads setup, but also it can make the gpu crash, so it's up to you to experiment  thanks for update  is this correct usage? { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : true}, didn't crash, but no hashrate changes too PS you broke JSON API. it shows "cryptonight_type": "\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000" instead of normalv7 FIXED, thanks for reporting 
|
|
|
|
LeonManveli
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 08:47:37 AM |
|
Thank you doktor83 
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 10:07:05 AM |
|
"•BXB-miner with CPU/NVIDIA support" for a cryptonight based coin...AMD cards are much more efficient to mine CN, even heavy.
|
|
|
|
dingdongtobias
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 156
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 10:13:45 AM |
|
Thanks for the update seems good, sorry for silly question, how does one access the log file?
You must turn on log first, put in start.bat : SRBMiner-CN.exe --config config.txt --pools pools.txt --logfile log.txt
|
|
|
|
RuMiner
Member

Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 15
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 10:39:41 AM |
|
Thanks for the update seems good, sorry for silly question, how does one access the log file? You must turn on log first, put in start.bat : SRBMiner-CN.exe --config config.txt --pools pools.txt --logfile log.txt N.B. if you point a subdir, you shoud create it first, miner cannot make it itself I use "--logfile logs\%date%-%random%.log", so every miner start is a different log file
|
|
|
|
YukiSG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 11:14:29 AM |
|
For those using 4GB 570/580.
1.6.0 has some major update (IMO) that benefits quite alot.
Dual Thread now Hashes higher than single thread. (roughly 20-40h/s increase per card)
Currently im back to using
29 intensity with dual thread of worksize 8.
as compared to 59 intensity single thread worksize 8.
I gained 20h-40h/s per card.
my Elpida card is hashing at 900/hs while the rest of the hynix are hashing at 810 - 860h/s
Like my work/Discovery?
Donate me to help me clear my debt.
ETH: 0x052898045e73a56691eca5210EE6a2Aa15397295
|
|
|
|
popow_sergei
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 11:25:26 AM |
|
[2018-06-08 23:07:33] Error CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY when creating clCreateCommandQueue for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0) [2018-06-08 23:07:33] Error initing GPU's. Stopping miner process 
|
|
|
|
Kgonla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 12:30:48 PM |
|
Here is what is slowing down the startup:
[2018-06-09 13:52:22] CryptonightV7 mode enabled [2018-06-09 13:53:46] DevFee pool SET [2018-06-09 13:53:46] DevFee address SET [2018-06-09 13:53:46] Starting init of mining threads
The difficulty monitor is slow responding & varies alot, the fastest I had after 4 times have been 12 seconds:
[2018-06-09 13:56:38] pool_have_job: Pool difficulty: 60000 [2018-06-09 13:56:38] pool_have_job: Pool sent a new job (ID: 487651957152411) [2018-06-09 13:56:50] difficulty_monitor: Difficulty (60000) is higher than the defined max difficulty for this pool (40000)!
And the worst 42 seconds
Also, after running the program for a few minutes it closed without advice
|
|
|
|
hesido
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 157
Merit: 5
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 12:50:01 PM |
|
Kill windows 1803 update with fire: Here's what we have so far about win 1803 update effect on me, after applying all known fixes:
I can't get all 13 gpus to work above 900 h/s each, a very low intensity seems to work. I used to do stable 1040 h/s. Hash rate fluctuates badly. GPU-Z trick does NOT work.
tldr, Windows 1803 update is utter bullshit. I failed to prevent it from installing, so it's my fault. I'm thinking of leaving to a miner Os, I hope SRBMiner adds linux compatibility.
|
|
|
|
Kgonla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 01:06:42 PM |
|
I think I can confirm...
After the difficulty monitor is executed for 4th time the program closes itself
[2018-06-09 15:01:33] Connection to pool lost. Reconnecting in 10 seconds.
And the program is closed.
|
|
|
|
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 2
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 01:08:28 PM |
|
Kill windows 1803 update with fire: Here's what we have so far about win 1803 update effect on me, after applying all known fixes:
I can't get all 13 gpus to work above 900 h/s each, a very low intensity seems to work. I used to do stable 1040 h/s. Hash rate fluctuates badly. GPU-Z trick does NOT work.
tldr, Windows 1803 update is utter bullshit. I failed to prevent it from installing, so it's my fault. I'm thinking of leaving to a miner Os, I hope SRBMiner adds linux compatibility.
I think it's more easy to just go back to an earlier build of Windows 10, that solved my problem. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/go-back-to-an-earlier-build-of-windows-10
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 01:17:32 PM |
|
I think I can confirm...
After the difficulty monitor is executed for 4th time the program closes itself
[2018-06-09 15:01:33] Connection to pool lost. Reconnecting in 10 seconds.
And the program is closed.
i will check it out. Also it's not triggerring momentally when the set difficulty is reached. Check is made every 45 seconds. No point setting it for ex 1 sec because it just eats up cpu resources, and i think its not THAT important to disconnect momentally. But correct me if i am wrong.
|
|
|
|
SeriousOne
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 01:21:30 PM |
|
@ dok I am so sorry, i saw you have done changes on DevFee. I just wanted to report it was really never caused by DevFee, it was just a coincidence. I don't use Windows 10 for personal use, i have used only Windows 7 before very well. So i never looked in to the new Settings Panel of the "metro" gui, i just prefer to use old windows settings windows. Seems to that i have to adopt the new Settings panels. Sorry again, best miner we have ever seen, happy to know that you get your well deserved fees 
|
|
|
|
hesido
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 157
Merit: 5
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 01:46:51 PM |
|
Kill windows 1803 update with fire: Here's what we have so far about win 1803 update effect on me, after applying all known fixes:
I can't get all 13 gpus to work above 900 h/s each, a very low intensity seems to work. I used to do stable 1040 h/s. Hash rate fluctuates badly. GPU-Z trick does NOT work.
tldr, Windows 1803 update is utter bullshit. I failed to prevent it from installing, so it's my fault. I'm thinking of leaving to a miner Os, I hope SRBMiner adds linux compatibility.
I think it's more easy to just go back to an earlier build of Windows 10, that solved my problem. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/go-back-to-an-earlier-build-of-windows-10Doing this as we speak, great tip, I honestly thought it was only possible with windows restore turned on, which I had turned off. Awesome..
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 01:59:06 PM |
|
dok, I have an interesting problem. Using v1.6.0, with 5 rx470-8gb, stellite4 algo: All 5 GPUs initialize and are identified correctly on your miner, then after pool connection, display shows only FOUR GPUs, but the first one, GPU0, has DOUBLE the output of all others, I tried restarting, but with same output. Now this isn't a hashrate problem at the pool, just on the miner display. I think that the GPU bus identification is wrong on one of the cards by the miner software.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
doktor83
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 02:05:51 PM |
|
dok, I have an interesting problem. Using v1.6.0, with 5 rx470-8gb, stellite4 algo: All 5 GPUs initialize and are identified correctly on your miner, then after pool connection, display shows only FOUR GPUs, but the first one, GPU0, has DOUBLE the output of all others, I tried restarting, but with same output. Now this isn't a hashrate problem at the pool, just on the miner display. I think that the GPU bus identification is wrong on one of the cards by the miner software.
are you also on win 10 v1803 and some 18.5.2 or newer drivers?
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 02:08:53 PM |
|
dok, I have an interesting problem. Using v1.6.0, with 5 rx470-8gb, stellite4 algo: All 5 GPUs initialize and are identified correctly on your miner, then after pool connection, display shows only FOUR GPUs, but the first one, GPU0, has DOUBLE the output of all others, I tried restarting, but with same output. Now this isn't a hashrate problem at the pool, just on the miner display. I think that the GPU bus identification is wrong on one of the cards by the miner software.
are you also on win 10 v1803 and some 18.5.2 or newer drivers? Win 7-64, blockchain drivers (Aug), and yes the first and last GPU are both being identified as bus 7
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
doktor83
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 02:11:19 PM |
|
dok, I have an interesting problem. Using v1.6.0, with 5 rx470-8gb, stellite4 algo: All 5 GPUs initialize and are identified correctly on your miner, then after pool connection, display shows only FOUR GPUs, but the first one, GPU0, has DOUBLE the output of all others, I tried restarting, but with same output. Now this isn't a hashrate problem at the pool, just on the miner display. I think that the GPU bus identification is wrong on one of the cards by the miner software.
are you also on win 10 v1803 and some 18.5.2 or newer drivers? Win 7-64, blockchain drivers (Aug), and yes the first and last GPU are both being identified as bus 7 could you turn on logger and send it to me?
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
 |
June 09, 2018, 02:15:29 PM |
|
I've not find anything about this in first post or readme : is there any option to limit log file size ? Actually it's just growing day after day. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|