zyzzyva
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
|
May 10, 2016, 11:58:30 AM |
|
1. I have used other proxy solution before this, and usually ethminer sends shares to Geth via a proxy server, and when block is solved it is accepted by Geth... since this version v4.2 is directly hashing into geth, the only indication that I successfully mined a solo block is on the CDM console or local MIST wallet, correct?
I think you would see an accepted share in Claymore's miner for each found block. That's been my experience so far with Expanse/gexp. EDIT: I can also confirm that v4.2 works for Expanse solo mining.
|
|
|
|
malefactor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2016, 12:25:18 PM |
|
completely useless bug report follows, but I feel obligated to offer it.
4.1, dual mining in linux. after several days,
read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable
attempts to restart mining just hang. soft (AHCI) reboot fixes it (implies not a hard hang at GPU/driver).
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 10, 2016, 12:28:11 PM |
|
completely useless bug report follows, but I feel obligated to offer it.
4.1, dual mining in linux. after several days,
read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable read(): Resource temporarily unavailable
attempts to restart just hang.
Was fixed a few days ago, re-download v4.1 or use 4.2.
|
|
|
|
malefactor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2016, 12:29:54 PM |
|
read(): Resource temporarily unavailable
Was fixed a few days ago, re-download v4.1 or use 4.2. awesome--will do. thanks!
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
|
May 10, 2016, 01:01:25 PM |
|
How to make this16gb virtual memory? And where? Could it be reason for low 280/370/380 series amd, hashrate?
Ok I found but what consequences could have to small size?
|
I am looking for signature campaign pm me
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
May 10, 2016, 01:22:51 PM |
|
1. I have used other proxy solution before this, and usually ethminer sends shares to Geth via a proxy server, and when block is solved it is accepted by Geth... since this version v4.2 is directly hashing into geth, the only indication that I successfully mined a solo block is on the CDM console or local MIST wallet, correct?
I think you would see an accepted share in Claymore's miner for each found block. That's been my experience so far with Expanse/gexp. EDIT: I can also confirm that v4.2 works for Expanse solo mining. Thanks!
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 10, 2016, 03:32:36 PM |
|
My miner does not use any sources from ethminer, so any bugs/fixes related to ethminer are not related to it.
|
|
|
|
melloyellow
|
|
May 10, 2016, 03:40:46 PM |
|
My miner does not use any sources from ethminer, so any bugs/fixes related to ethminer are not related to my miner. Yes, I was just curious about the underlying idea, that sometimes 'a nonce matches with previous headerHash but is submitted with new headerHash resulting low difficulty share' These shares could find blocks and uncles. Looking forward to your next version with remote management Thanks.
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 10, 2016, 03:49:20 PM |
|
getting about 18-21 mh /s for eth and 480-520mh for dcr ethi 8 and dcri 50. How can I get better performance? I don't have luck increasing them even with overclocking. The hashrate just don't change o.O. Can anyone help? I'm using 16.3 driver though. 8GB ram, 4 x 380x all at stock setting for the above rate.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 10, 2016, 04:11:23 PM |
|
getting about 18-21 mh /s for eth and 480-520mh for dcr ethi 8 and dcri 50. How can I get better performance? I don't have luck increasing them even with overclocking. The hashrate just don't change o.O. Can anyone help? I'm using 16.3 driver though. 8GB ram, 4 x 380x all at stock setting for the above rate.
For me the sweet spot is with ethi 16 and dcri 30. That's the combination that will produce a better ETH/DCR balance in my rigs
|
|
|
|
parmatiya
|
|
May 10, 2016, 04:22:12 PM |
|
How to make this16gb virtual memory? And where? Could it be reason for low 280/370/380 series amd, hashrate?
Ok I found but what consequences could have to small size?
If you have small virtual memory and some of your GPU cannot be recognised by the miner and cannot mine.
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
May 10, 2016, 04:40:09 PM |
|
Thank you for the release. But i can't understand why my own monitor utility connected direct to the wallet shows the hashrate only for original ethminer. My request code "{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate", "params":[],"id":71}"; Maybe you can look at this issue ?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
May 10, 2016, 04:45:18 PM |
|
Thank you for the release. But i can't understand why my own monitor utility connected direct to the wallet shows the hashrate only for original ethminer. My request code "{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate", "params":[],"id":71}"; Maybe you can look at this issue ? Miner does not send hashrate in http mode. I thought it is useless. So you can see sum hashrates from all ethminers somehow? Explain how you do it and I will check it.
|
|
|
|
Tavarua
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2016, 04:48:17 PM |
|
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 10, 2016, 04:55:11 PM |
|
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
May 10, 2016, 05:06:12 PM |
|
Thank you for the release. But i can't understand why my own monitor utility connected direct to the wallet shows the hashrate only for original ethminer. My request code "{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate", "params":[],"id":71}"; Maybe you can look at this issue ? Miner does not send hashrate in http mode. I thought it is useless. So you can see sum hashrates from all ethminers somehow? Explain how you do it and I will check it. I send JSON-RPC request to my wallet described here https://ethereum.gitbooks.io/frontier-guide/content/rpc.html and then read response with javax.json.* Returns the number of hashes per second that the node is mining with.
Parameters
none
Returns
QUANTITY - number of hashes per second. Example
// Request curl -X POST --data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_hashrate","params":[],"id":71}'
// Result { "id":71, "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": "0x38a" }
|
|
|
|
Beachguy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1019
Merit: 1001
Spectreproject Community Manager
|
|
May 10, 2016, 06:09:52 PM |
|
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late. Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such. 1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH 2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2 1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12 pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running.
|
|
|
|
Heardalis
|
|
May 10, 2016, 06:17:03 PM |
|
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late. Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such. 1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH 2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2 1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12 pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running. I got sum 270x to. First i test it with only eth. I get 14.8 mhs ( thats poor when i compare it with other miner, i get around 16) but when i switch to dual mining i get 15.5 for eth and 240 for dcr.
|
|
|
|
gami82
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 10, 2016, 06:50:29 PM |
|
Are the R9 270's functional w/Claymore's DP miner? I've got a box of them and in the process of building a new rig.
A have a rig with 6 x 270x happily mining at 80~82 MHs I have some R9 270X as well...quite happy, if I had a box of them , I'd get mining before its too late. Eth only, nothing fancy , no overclock and such. 1 - Asus R9 270X 2GB 12.880mH 2 - MSI R9 270X 4GB 14.17~14.2 1 MSI HD 7850 - 2 GB 11.08~11.12 pulling 53.2~53.4 MH nice cool running. 4 rigs 2- 5x Sapphire R9 390 NITRO - PSU 1700 W - OC 1170/1500 - Win10 2- 4x Sapphire R9 390 NITRO - PSU 1600 W - OC 1170/1500 - Win10 pulling 564.6 MH Its already too late for you. You'll never get ROI. Diff grows and grows Hashrate with 5 Cards is slow. What is your power consumption?
|
|
|
|
|