|
Askit2
|
 |
April 26, 2013, 09:10:45 AM |
|
Just updated to version 3.0.1 my 7970 runs fine but my 5770 just gives error.
invalid nonce - HW error.
I'm using ccc version 13.4 on windows 7 64bit.
Anyone have any idea how to fix this issue? Put on separate MBs and it should work ok. Same MB not so much. Is in the readme about mixing and matching different series cards. Drivers work great on one aren't great on the other and sometimes cause other issues. Segregate into only 5XXX, 6XXX, or 7XXX cards to a rig and it will work great. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
ProfNova
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
April 26, 2013, 09:28:14 AM |
|
Just updated to version 3.0.1 my 7970 runs fine but my 5770 just gives error.
invalid nonce - HW error.
I'm using ccc version 13.4 on windows 7 64bit.
Anyone have any idea how to fix this issue? Put on separate MBs and it should work ok. Same MB not so much. Is in the readme about mixing and matching different series cards. Drivers work great on one aren't great on the other and sometimes cause other issues. Segregate into only 5XXX, 6XXX, or 7XXX cards to a rig and it will work great. I have had no issue before in this setup only when I updated to the latest version of cg miner as I don't get this problem on ver 2.11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
dg2010
|
|
April 26, 2013, 09:43:51 AM |
|
The latest 3.01 CGminer is getting detected by Kaspersky as UDS:DangerousObject.Multi.Generic
Anyone see the same?
|
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
April 26, 2013, 10:27:27 AM |
|
Just managed to get the first stable run of the new cgminer code for BFL ASICs on the Jalapeño with the early working code for it.
(5s):5.974G (avg):5.916Gh/s | A:748 R:4 HW:0 U:38.2/m WU:86.6/m
Seems it's a bit faster than advertised which is nice. Not sure exactly why that is but perhaps the earlier ones were not the final boards they were going to release them with. More news as it comes to hand...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
stevegee58
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 916
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 26, 2013, 10:32:39 AM |
|
When are you putting the code into git so I can get a hold of it, Josh said there should be one in the mail for me as well, I will be your verify if you want  . Hackathon is underway. As soon as the code is in git master and working, I will inform the forum. EDIT: I've received one too now. Hah! So let's see your unboxing vidya then! |
You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
April 26, 2013, 11:50:47 AM
Last edit: April 26, 2013, 06:27:06 PM by os2sam |
|
The latest 3.01 CGminer is getting detected by Kaspersky as UDS:DangerousObject.Multi.Generic
Anyone see the same?
Q: Is this a virus?
A: Cgminer is being packaged with other trojan scripts and some antivirus
software is falsely accusing cgminer.exe as being the actual virus, rather
than whatever it is being packaged with. If you installed cgminer yourself,
then you do not have a virus on your computer. Complain to your antivirus
software company. They seem to be flagging even source code now from cgminer
as viruses, even though text source files can't do anything by themself. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
April 26, 2013, 11:55:20 AM
Last edit: April 26, 2013, 06:26:41 PM by os2sam |
|
Just updated to version 3.0.1 my 7970 runs fine but my 5770 just gives error.
invalid nonce - HW error.
I'm using ccc version 13.4 on windows 7 64bit.
Anyone have any idea how to fix this issue? Put on separate MBs and it should work ok. Same MB not so much. Is in the readme about mixing and matching different series cards. Drivers work great on one aren't great on the other and sometimes cause other issues. Segregate into only 5XXX, 6XXX, or 7XXX cards to a rig and it will work great. I have had no issue before in this setup only when I updated to the latest version of cg miner as I don't get this problem on ver 2.11.4 Q: Which AMD SDK is the best for cgminer?
A: At the moment, versions 2.4 and 2.5 work the best for R5xxx and R6xxx GPUS.
SDK 2.6 or 2.7 works best for R7xxx. SDK 2.8 is known to have many problems.
If you are need to use the 2.6+ SDK or R7xxx or later, the phatk kernel will
perform poorly, while the diablo or my custom modified poclbm kernel are
optimised for it. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
April 26, 2013, 12:00:49 PM |
|
Hah! So let's see your unboxing vidya then!
Not my style, but I can take a photo if you like. However there are quite a few photos of them around now. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
ewibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1049
|
|
April 26, 2013, 12:03:26 PM |
|
Q: Which AMD SDK is the best for cgminer?
A: At the moment, versions 2.4 and 2.5 work the best for R5xxx and R6xxx GPUS.
SDK 2.6 or 2.7 works best for R7xxx. SDK 2.8 is known to have many problems.
If you are need to use the 2.6+ SDK or R7xxx or later, the phatk kernel will
perform poorly, while the diablo or my custom modified poclbm kernel are
optimised for it.
how do I quick see which version of AMD SDK I have installed? (Ubuntu 12.04) TIA |
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 26, 2013, 12:23:55 PM |
|
... and anyone interested  There's a change from the spec with the ZOX command  The reply from getting the work result queue (ZOX) has an extra line (vs the spec) inserted first at the top. It is: "INPROCESS:1<LF>" (1 or 0) 1 means it is currently hashing on work 0 means it isn't No idea why they added that. We certainly don't need it |
|
|
|
Subo1977
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 344
Merit: 250
Flixxo - Watch, Share, Earn!
|
|
April 26, 2013, 02:06:34 PM |
|
Hi,
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
|
|
|
|
Mylon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Mining FTW
|
|
April 26, 2013, 03:40:53 PM |
|
Hi,
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
That would explain why I'm not able to push my 7970 above 600 with this release. |
"All Your Base Are Belong To Us" by CATS
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
April 26, 2013, 03:43:43 PM |
|
Hi,
is there a different between the cminer.exe from the downloadpage and one selfcompiled on Windows?
The downloaded .exe is ~500 K and the selfcompiled ~320K ?
That would explain why I'm not able to push my 7970 above 600 with this release. Nonsense that would have no effect on your hashrate. The reason it's larger is the exe is compiled with support for all the drivers. |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
jmfg187
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
April 26, 2013, 04:23:13 PM |
|
Can you help me figure out what is wrong when I try to use 3.0.1? It is specific to this new version because 2.11.4 is still working. I am on Windows 7 x64 with all the updates and I have a 6970 in it with the 13.5 beta 2 AMD drivers. cgminer.exe caused an Access Violation at location 004312fa in module cgminer.exe Reading from location 052d51ce.
Registers:
eax=00000000 ebx=0028f03c ecx=00000000 edx=00000000 esi=0200a8c8 edi=0206266a
eip=771b15de esp=0028f028 ebp=0028f558 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na po nc
cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00000246
Call stack:
771B15DE ntdll.dll:771B15DE ZwRaiseException
0043341B cgminer.exe:0043341B
00430291 cgminer.exe:00430291
00418D16 cgminer.exe:00418D16
004010B9 cgminer.exe:004010B9 __mingw_CRTStartup crt1.c:244
00401284 cgminer.exe:00401284 WinMainCRTStartup crt1.c:274
76B333AA kernel32.dll:76B333AA BaseThreadInitThunk
771C9EF2 ntdll.dll:771C9EF2 RtlInitializeExceptionChain
771C9EC5 ntdll.dll:771C9EC5 RtlInitializeExceptionChain
 Thank you! |
BTC: 17nmAJ5N2fKMTGymAarp4DUPXjHkohacXQ LTC: LUzmyjMuVWyU9coa7iEQYgGWKDBKRsiLmo NVC: 4Pby77nChLzU2rsi2RsLpM8C95dKF5XTbg FC: 6nKefP46bnT3P1XP9jaEugYd84UdW4zrL3
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 26, 2013, 05:04:11 PM |
|
... 13.5 beta 2 AMD drivers ...
Try something more reliable?
|
|
|
|
|
Delarock
|
|
April 26, 2013, 05:41:41 PM |
|
I couldn't get it working with 13.4 either, but it's working fine with 13.1.
|
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 26, 2013, 06:13:08 PM |
|
it's working fine with 13.1.
I found your solution! |
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090
Think for yourself
|
|
April 26, 2013, 06:24:35 PM |
|
Q: Which AMD driver is the best?
A: Unfortunately AMD has a history of having quite a few releases with issues
when it comes to mining, either in terms of breaking mining, increasing CPU
usage or very low hashrates. Only experimentation can tell you for sure, but
some good releases were 11.6, 11.12, 12.4 and 12.8. Note that older cards may
not work with the newer drivers. |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
|
April 26, 2013, 07:11:29 PM |
|
Has anyone tested these drivers on 5850's with cgminer using scrypt?
Headsup for 5k series users. Ok. I've expressed uninstalled 13.2 Beta 7, ran driver sweeper in safe mode, rebooted back into safe mode, did a registry clean with registry clean expert, rebooted. I've installed 13.5 Beta 2 on my Windows7 x64 machine. I am guessing with supplied SDK, as GPU-z showed I have opencl enabled. Mining on cgminer 3.0.1-windows scrypt. I don't see any increase nor decrease in hash rate for litecoin mining with my two 5850's on 13.5 Beta 2 with cgminer 3.0.1-Windows scrypt. So far, so good. This is good news for me so far, prior, anything over past 13.2 beta 7 drivers, I had sensor detect problems with hwinfo64, and overclock problems, these problems are solved with this latest AMD driver I am using now, also this driver is good for 7k series card I am guessing, so, if and when I get a 7950, I should have no problems, hopefully. ~Cheers |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
April 26, 2013, 08:33:07 PM |
|
last version give me error with p2pool, like lost connection to server
|
|
|
|
|
|
