hesido
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 158
Merit: 5
|
 |
May 17, 2018, 01:25:25 PM |
|
V1.5.4
- Press 'r' while mining to reload pools
Awesome sauce, just in time! Now if you also can do delayed pool switch, this is going to be even better! In a long list of pools, this would avoid frequent connects / disconnects / job flushes! (Defer by timer or wait until new job, or wait until accepted hash, all would do fine with me  Doktor, any plans to integrate command functions to the api? Like I want to switch pools etc, control the miner basically.
No, it will stay read only, sorry.  Understandable. I was going to try to create a monitor along with a coin switcher. Guess it's technically still possible through keyboard emulation, but that does sound too "hacky". |
|
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
May 17, 2018, 02:27:23 PM |
|
Dok,
I have an interesting phenomenon I'd like to get your opinion:
I have installed on one PC two identical Sapphire RX 470 8GB cards, both with Uber-Mix 3.1 BIOS mods. Using your 1.5.1 miner, Heavy algo, 0 intensity, 2 threads, 8 worksize, they get 1070 H/S at 1260/2000 with blockchain (Robinhood) AMD drivers for win 7-64. The computer uses the on-motherboard integrated graphics for the monitor. The funny thing is, sometimes when starting one of the cards will hang around 1000-1020, the other will go up to 1070 like always. If I open up OverdriveNTool and modify the P1 memory voltage by any amount for the GPU that is lower, then the GPU will jump up to 1070. If I save that setting and reboot the computer, it still doesn't go to 1070. I have to make the change while the miner is running. Any idea what is happening here?
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
hesido
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 158
Merit: 5
|
|
May 17, 2018, 04:23:54 PM |
|
Dok,
I have an interesting phenomenon I'd like to get your opinion:
I have installed on one PC two identical Sapphire RX 470 8GB cards, both with Uber-Mix 3.1 BIOS mods. Using your 1.5.1 miner, Heavy algo, 0 intensity, 2 threads, 8 worksize, they get 1070 H/S at 1260/2000 with blockchain (Robinhood) AMD drivers for win 7-64. The computer uses the on-motherboard integrated graphics for the monitor. The funny thing is, sometimes when starting one of the cards will hang around 1000-1020, the other will go up to 1070 like always. If I open up OverdriveNTool and modify the P1 memory voltage by any amount for the GPU that is lower, then the GPU will jump up to 1070. If I save that setting and reboot the computer, it still doesn't go to 1070. I have to make the change while the miner is running. Any idea what is happening here?
Can you try running GPU-Z instead of tinkering with OverclockNTool? People, including me, are reporting consistent hashrate increase when running GPU-Z. Please let us know if it you get a similar speed bump. |
|
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
May 17, 2018, 04:37:07 PM |
|
Dok,
I have an interesting phenomenon I'd like to get your opinion:
I have installed on one PC two identical Sapphire RX 470 8GB cards, both with Uber-Mix 3.1 BIOS mods. Using your 1.5.1 miner, Heavy algo, 0 intensity, 2 threads, 8 worksize, they get 1070 H/S at 1260/2000 with blockchain (Robinhood) AMD drivers for win 7-64. The computer uses the on-motherboard integrated graphics for the monitor. The funny thing is, sometimes when starting one of the cards will hang around 1000-1020, the other will go up to 1070 like always. If I open up OverdriveNTool and modify the P1 memory voltage by any amount for the GPU that is lower, then the GPU will jump up to 1070. If I save that setting and reboot the computer, it still doesn't go to 1070. I have to make the change while the miner is running. Any idea what is happening here?
Can you try running GPU-Z instead of tinkering with OverclockNTool? People, including me, are reporting consistent hashrate increase when running GPU-Z. Please let us know if it you get a similar speed bump. Nope, that drops it substantially, I quit GPU-Z and it stays low. Have to disable/reenable the GPUs and restart the miner and wait about 5 minutes for it to return to 1070. |
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
|
May 17, 2018, 05:03:34 PM |
|
Dok,
I have an interesting phenomenon I'd like to get your opinion:
I have installed on one PC two identical Sapphire RX 470 8GB cards, both with Uber-Mix 3.1 BIOS mods. Using your 1.5.1 miner, Heavy algo, 0 intensity, 2 threads, 8 worksize, they get 1070 H/S at 1260/2000 with blockchain (Robinhood) AMD drivers for win 7-64. The computer uses the on-motherboard integrated graphics for the monitor. The funny thing is, sometimes when starting one of the cards will hang around 1000-1020, the other will go up to 1070 like always. If I open up OverdriveNTool and modify the P1 memory voltage by any amount for the GPU that is lower, then the GPU will jump up to 1070. If I save that setting and reboot the computer, it still doesn't go to 1070. I have to make the change while the miner is running. Any idea what is happening here?
Can you try running GPU-Z instead of tinkering with OverclockNTool? People, including me, are reporting consistent hashrate increase when running GPU-Z. Please let us know if it you get a similar speed bump. Nope, that drops it substantially, I quit GPU-Z and it stays low. Have to disable/reenable the GPUs and restart the miner and wait about 5 minutes for it to return to 1070. I feel this more likely has to do with the drivers handling the Heavy implementation. Try giving a little higher voltage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
livada
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2018, 07:42:27 PM |
|
Any have 16Bgb card? vega 64 frontier 16gb ?
how many thread use on HEAVY algo? 2 or 4? hashrate on 64 8gb is 1500hr . On 16 gb hr is? 2500-3000hr? or only 1500?Ž
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
|
May 17, 2018, 08:30:31 PM |
|
Any have 16Bgb card? vega 64 frontier 16gb ?
how many thread use on HEAVY algo? 2 or 4? hashrate on 64 8gb is 1500hr . On 16 gb hr is? 2500-3000hr? or only 1500?Ž
2150-2300 odd on Vega FE. |
|
|
|
|
Vince34
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2018, 08:47:17 PM |
|
Hi dok, I use V7 algo with 4 vega 56 V1.5.4 and V1.5.3 give me 7600h/s, stable V1.5.2 and previous versions give me 7850h/s, stable So, I stick to V1.5.2  Have you got an explanation for that ? |
|
|
|
|
livada
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 417
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2018, 08:52:08 PM |
|
Any have 16Bgb card? vega 64 frontier 16gb ?
how many thread use on HEAVY algo? 2 or 4? hashrate on 64 8gb is 1500hr . On 16 gb hr is? 2500-3000hr? or only 1500?Ž
2150-2300 odd on Vega FE. 16gb? 2 or 4 thread u use? in HEAVY or v7? how much electricity use? my vega 56 use 135W per card in heavy algo |
|
|
|
|
zawawa
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 304
Miner Developer
|
|
May 18, 2018, 01:39:29 AM |
|
Hmm... impressive. Thanks, guys!
I will come back with a comparison table between SRBMiner and GGS.
|
Gateless Gate Sharp, an open-source ETH/XMR miner: http://bit.ly/2rJ2x4VBTC: 1BHwDWVerUTiKxhHPf2ubqKKiBMiKQGomZ |
|
|
treanski
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 106
ONe Social Network.
|
|
May 18, 2018, 04:21:09 AM |
|
Any have 16Bgb card? vega 64 frontier 16gb ?
how many thread use on HEAVY algo? 2 or 4? hashrate on 64 8gb is 1500hr . On 16 gb hr is? 2500-3000hr? or only 1500?Ž
2150-2300 odd on Vega FE. no its possible because heavy is memory intensive, i would say with the right config even more is possible... my vegas 56 doing ~1580hs on 1480/950 clocks |
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
May 18, 2018, 06:15:54 AM |
|
Hmm... impressive. Thanks, guys!
I will come back with a comparison table between SRBMiner and GGS.
Why? I am not hijacking in your thread showing off results from my miner. If someone is interested in your software he will visit your thread. Or maybe i should go there advertise my miner? |
|
|
|
|
doktor83 (OP)
|
|
May 18, 2018, 06:20:38 AM |
|
Hi dok, I use V7 algo with 4 vega 56 V1.5.4 and V1.5.3 give me 7600h/s, stable V1.5.2 and previous versions give me 7850h/s, stable So, I stick to V1.5.2 Have you got an explanation for that ? There shouldn't be any differences, those are gremlins working there  |
|
|
|
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 2
|
|
May 18, 2018, 09:40:30 AM |
|
any advice intensity and worksize for alloy? I tried rx 580 8GB only got 400-500 h/s with intensity 54 and worksize 8.
|
|
|
|
|
lncm
Member
Offline
Activity: 388
Merit: 13
|
|
May 18, 2018, 03:38:23 PM |
|
Does it work with latest AMD drivers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
heavyarms1912
|
|
May 18, 2018, 04:08:09 PM |
|
any advice intensity and worksize for alloy? I tried rx 580 8GB only got 400-500 h/s with intensity 54 and worksize 8.
Alloycoin is Ultraheavy algo, ~50-60% hashrate of CN-V7. |
|
|
|
|
SauteedEntrails
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2018, 07:48:07 PM |
|
BEWARE the DEV fee will run for HOURS!
Ive been using this for 3days straight noticed my pool showed me offline for 4hrs, checked the miners they were submitting shares and running fine scrolled up to 4hrs before and thats when the dev fee switched. it stated it finished and sent back to my mining work but it didnt. very sneaky.
Check your miners often if you continue to use this sneaky software.
|
|
|
|
|
dingdongtobias
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 156
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2018, 08:10:56 PM |
|
BEWARE the DEV fee will run for HOURS!
Ive been using this for 3days straight noticed my pool showed me offline for 4hrs, checked the miners they were submitting shares and running fine scrolled up to 4hrs before and thats when the dev fee switched. it stated it finished and sent back to my mining work but it didnt. very sneaky.
Check your miners often if you continue to use this sneaky software.
You liar, post some logs |
|
|
|
|
|
