FiatKiller
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:42:01 PM |
|
I should be getting some eruptors next week. Are you saying with 3.2.1, I don't need any special USB drivers or settings? I know things are constantly in flux with these new devices...
thanks
On linux, nothing to do, just plug them in and run 3.2.1 On windows, you need to install the WinUSB driver with Zadig, not the default windows driver, then run 3.2.1 What do you think about using the VCP driver mentioned here: (works with 3.1.1) http://rdmsnippets.com/tag/block-erupter-usb/
|
|
|
|
twmz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:44:23 PM |
|
... Though I will add, anyone who has a few of them and uses them could they report how it's going? Thanks. ...
I only have one, but it is working fine with 3.2.1 on linux. Showing up as AMU 0 and hashing normally. The very first time I launched 3.2.1, it didn't show up right away and then appeared 10 seconds later as a hotplug device even though it had been plugged in all along. I assume this was just from the delay in the device getting fully initialized. If I quit and restart cgminer, it appears right away from then on. So, no problems yet (and I don't have the SICK problem reported by Dunkelheit667).
|
Was I helpful? 1 TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs WoT, GPGBitrated user: ewal.
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:46:17 PM |
|
I should be getting some eruptors next week. Are you saying with 3.2.1, I don't need any special USB drivers or settings? I know things are constantly in flux with these new devices...
thanks
On linux, nothing to do, just plug them in and run 3.2.1 On windows, you need to install the WinUSB driver with Zadig, not the default windows driver, then run 3.2.1 What do you think about using the VCP driver mentioned here: (works with 3.1.1) http://rdmsnippets.com/tag/block-erupter-usb/That is using the now-defunct serial interface which cgminer 3.2+ no longer uses, much like the ftdi_sio driver did. We use direct USB code.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
FiatKiller
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:50:39 PM |
|
Thanks, and no one is reporting issues running the normal usb devices(keyboard, mouse, printers, etc.) using the zadig driver? Planning on running them on my main desktop, so I don't want any problems with normal activities. :-D
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:51:41 PM |
|
Thanks, and no one is reporting issues running the normal usb devices(keyboard, mouse, printers, etc.) using the zadig driver? Planning on running them on my main desktop, so I don't want any problems with normal activities. :-D
Zadig is a tool to associate your choice of driver with the device you want, it is not a driver. Only associate WinUSB with the mining device and don't touch any other USB devices...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
pengoau
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:53:11 PM |
|
hey guys
I have 3 gpus in my system 1 apu and 2 dedicated gpus, how can i startup cgminer with the third gpu (gpu 2) turned off? I tried setting intensity to 0 but that doesn't work.
Do I specify it via the -d switch? If so what is the syntax?
Thanks
-d 0-1 --remove-disabled I added that to my bat file and i get "invalid device number" fyi: GPU 0 = 6950 GPU 1 = 5770 GPU 2 = APU Thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 01:55:04 PM |
|
hey guys
I have 3 gpus in my system 1 apu and 2 dedicated gpus, how can i startup cgminer with the third gpu (gpu 2) turned off? I tried setting intensity to 0 but that doesn't work.
Do I specify it via the -d switch? If so what is the syntax?
Thanks
-d 0-1 --remove-disabled I added that to my bat file and i get "invalid device number" fyi: GPU 0 = 6950 GPU 1 = 5770 GPU 2 = APU Thanks for your help What is the output of 'cgminer -n' ?
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
ewibit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2955
Merit: 1050
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 02:00:49 PM |
|
First of all, thank you for taking care! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) And here you go. Good news, my AMUs were detected on the rpi. Bad news, declared sick after 60 seconds hashing: [2013-06-07 15:56:49] AMU1: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:56:49] AMU1: Attempting to restart [2013-06-07 15:57:05] AMU0: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:57:05] AMU0: Attempting to restart [2013-06-07 15:57:32] AMU2: invalid nonce - HW error [2013-06-07 15:57:37] Accepted c3f18eac Diff 1/1 AMU 2 [2013-06-07 15:57:42] AMU2: invalid nonce - HW error [2013-06-07 15:58:06] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU0: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU0: Attempting to restart [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU1: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU1: Attempting to restart
same here...
|
|
|
|
sLide.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 03:52:56 PM |
|
I'm experiencing a issue with CGminer.
I recently moved my XFX 6870 from my gaming machine which was used to mine when I wasn't gaming to my first rig. I keep getting error's from windows saying it had to stop the program from running.
MoBo: msi x58A-GD45 Proc: I7 920 Memory : 2GB Video Card: 6870 XFX HD - CCC Version - 13.4 Direct3D Version 9.14.10.0969
Not entirely sure what the problem could be. I've tried running as admin. Any help? Thanks!
I had same problem with incompatible OpenCL driver combination... Changing it might help In event log, I'm getting this error - - System - Provider [ Name] Application Error - EventID 1000 [ Qualifiers] 0 Level 2 Task 100 Keywords 0x80000000000000 - TimeCreated [ SystemTime] 2013-06-07T14:03:10.000000000Z EventRecordID 1752 Channel Application Computer Miner1-PC Security - EventData cgminer.exe 0.0.0.0 518e20db cgminer.exe 0.0.0.0 518e20db c0000005 000265be 12a0 01ce6387bbccda57 C:\Users\Miner1\Desktop\cgminer\cgminer-3.1.1-windows\cgminer.exe C:\Users\Miner1\Desktop\cgminer\cgminer-3.1.1-windows\cgminer.exe fc31de57-cf7a-11e2-8d68-6c626de9cc51 Any help on this. Google is saying that some of these error's happen when the Proc trys to access "No-Mans Land" in the memory. It's pretty much a dump spot. Any advice?
|
Aim - Slide.0 1J6UeiXtBYXmpA6uajRs3aJpUD1Tsj1CF3 - Tips?
|
|
|
turtle83
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 03:53:34 PM |
|
First of all, thank you for taking care! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) And here you go. Good news, my AMUs were detected on the rpi. Bad news, declared sick after 60 seconds hashing: [2013-06-07 15:56:49] AMU1: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:56:49] AMU1: Attempting to restart [2013-06-07 15:57:05] AMU0: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:57:05] AMU0: Attempting to restart [2013-06-07 15:57:32] AMU2: invalid nonce - HW error [2013-06-07 15:57:37] Accepted c3f18eac Diff 1/1 AMU 2 [2013-06-07 15:57:42] AMU2: invalid nonce - HW error [2013-06-07 15:58:06] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU0: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU0: Attempting to restart [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU1: Idle for more than 60 seconds, declaring SICK! [2013-06-07 15:58:19] AMU1: Attempting to restart
same here... Same issue with Ubintu. downgraded to 3.1.1 again.
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:07:05 PM |
|
This happened when I added 5970 and 5770 to my miner. With only 5 cores I didn't have problems. But I do have a mix of cards if that might be a problem. 6790, 6870, 5850, 2x5970, 5770. Running 2.11.4, but the same problem is on 3.2.0(3.x has problems with my pool. I get disconnected all the time). You've been told not to use -I 9 or higher for sha256 mining like 3 times now. Don't do it. When you decide to scrypt mine, which you seemed to imply you would at some point, you can try again, the -I levels are totally different for scrypt. -I 9 is included in "-I 9 or higher". Run at -I 8. None of the cards in your original quote start with a 7 and I'm pretty sure there has been much discussion (again, 2 or 3 hundred pages ago [and again, this may be an especially on Windows situation]) about -I 9 or higher only being useful for 7xxx cards. Running at too high of an intensity will cause the cards to go slower, which is what you are experiencing. I don't know how to test the bus, but I don't think you need to worry about testing the bus. If you were running at higher than -I 8 before, and nothing changed but an additional card on the bus, that seems like a pretty good test/indicator that the bus is overloaded. If anything else changed at the same time, then you can troubleshoot what else changed by trying to change it back and/or starting from scratch. If you were running a higher intensity on a different program before, then the numbers don't necessarily mean the same thing on a different program. Whatever... I figure it out but I don't know why this works... I have changed difficulty from 2 to 8 and now I can set intensity to whatever I like. And I got back missing 150MH by seting cards to 10 and 12. So I'm on full speed now. I know it is not the internet since I have tested the cards on another computer before installing it and they worked... I still think it is a bug... EDIT: So that much about getting slower over 8...
|
|
|
|
Naelr
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:32:20 PM |
|
I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.... Have 1 GPU, 1 BFL single fpga and 8 Block Erupters plugged into this machine.
Using cgminer 64 bit 3.2.1 the block erupters keep going zombie, after about an hour I have 21 zombies.. the good thing is they keep getting reset and keep right on hashing... but this can't be a good thing.... Kano, should I get and try your patch 3.2.1a? can I help add some more info....
The BLF and the GPU are fine and stable.
Naelr
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:34:00 PM |
|
Is there any performance benefits to 3.2.1 over 3.1.1? yeah, i know ya changed how the drivers work, but i'm wondering if i really need to upgrade a dedicated rig with ASICminers and one small GPU since i currently have 3.1.1 working. I'm kind of thinking "if it ain't broke, doen't fix it.".
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:36:33 PM |
|
Is there any performance benefits to 3.2.1 over 3.1.1? yeah, i know ya changed how the drivers work, but i'm wondering if i really need to upgrade a dedicated rig with ASICminers and one small GPU since i currently have 3.1.1 working. I'm kind of thinking "if it ain't broke, doen't fix it.".
It spouse to be less HW errors and CPU usage... So yes... More shares and less power consumption...
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:38:26 PM |
|
Is there any performance benefits to 3.2.1 over 3.1.1? yeah, i know ya changed how the drivers work, but i'm wondering if i really need to upgrade a dedicated rig with ASICminers and one small GPU since i currently have 3.1.1 working. I'm kind of thinking "if it ain't broke, doen't fix it.".
It spouse to be less HW errors... So yes... Ok, thanks. i'm not seeing many hardware errors, maybe 1 per 15 minutes, if that.
|
|
|
|
The00Dustin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:43:52 PM |
|
Whatever... I figure it out but I don't know why this works... I have changed difficulty from 2 to 8 and now I can set intensity to whatever I like. And I got back missing 150MH by seting cards to 10 and 12. So I'm on full speed now. I know it is not the internet since I have tested the cards on another computer before installing it and they worked... I still think it is a bug...
EDIT: So that much about getting slower over 8... Sounds like the CPU (or 100% CPU utilization AMD driver bug) is your bottleneck and not the bus. If you have a dual core or hyperthreading, 50% CPU = 100% CPU Utilization because cgminer is single-threaded. I apologize if that last ( italicized) statement isn't true, because I don't know it to be fact from reviewing any code. To clarify, I haven't run cgminer in Windows in a long time, but when I did, it seemed to be the case (it might be something else related to the drivers that is single threaded). Regardless, the point is that by increasing the difficulty, you reduced the number of shares that cgminer had to use the processor to validate, allowing more processor time to generate and distribute work. That having been said, if cgminer is still using 50% CPU, that is still wasting a lot of electricity and may not be worth the additional 150MH/s and/or the additional variance the higher difficulty will bring.
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 04:50:32 PM Last edit: June 07, 2013, 07:25:25 PM by Lucko |
|
Whatever... I figure it out but I don't know why this works... I have changed difficulty from 2 to 8 and now I can set intensity to whatever I like. And I got back missing 150MH by seting cards to 10 and 12. So I'm on full speed now. I know it is not the internet since I have tested the cards on another computer before installing it and they worked... I still think it is a bug...
EDIT: So that much about getting slower over 8... Sounds like the CPU (or 100% CPU utilization AMD driver bug) is your bottleneck and not the bus. If you have a dual core or hyperthreading, 50% CPU = 100% CPU Utilization because cgminer is single-threaded. I apologize if that last ( italicized) statement isn't true, because I don't know it to be fact from reviewing any code. To clarify, I haven't run cgminer in Windows in a long time, but when I did, it seemed to be the case (it might be something else related to the drivers that is single threaded). Regardless, the point is that by increasing the difficulty, you reduced the number of shares that cgminer had to use the processor to validate, allowing more processor time to generate and distribute work. That having been said, if cgminer is still using 50% CPU, that is still wasting a lot of electricity and may not be worth the additional 150MH/s and/or the additional variance the higher difficulty will bring. Nope one core. AMD 145... 35W on full and less then 50% usage... Pool is DMG so variance is not big issue. I got it working. I don't know why but it works. And I will not fix it until it brakes again... Is there any performance benefits to 3.2.1 over 3.1.1? yeah, i know ya changed how the drivers work, but i'm wondering if i really need to upgrade a dedicated rig with ASICminers and one small GPU since i currently have 3.1.1 working. I'm kind of thinking "if it ain't broke, doen't fix it.".
It spouse to be less HW errors... So yes... Ok, thanks. i'm not seeing many hardware errors, maybe 1 per 15 minutes, if that. Well I'm still using 2.11.4 since there is something in 3.x that makes it disconnect from my pool every now and then... So I'm also a fan of don't fix it if it is not broken... Hire uptime is important...
|
|
|
|
fcmatt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 05:04:18 PM |
|
This is a very long thread and my google searches have not discovered anything.
My question is has anyone seen cgminer fail to update the "Block" it is working on even though in the output you see that "Stratum from pool 0 has detected a new block"?
I am using 3.1.1. I am mining with --scrypt. It does not happen right away. The cgminer program might have to be running for a week. I have seen it happen a couple of times now on different mining computers.
I wanted to check the CHANGELOG but it appears to not contain anything.
Simply closing the program and reopening it fixes the issue.
So I am asking here. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Naelr
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 05:08:03 PM |
|
I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.... Have 1 GPU, 1 BFL single fpga and 8 Block Erupters plugged into this machine.
Using cgminer 64 bit 3.2.1 the block erupters keep going zombie, after about an hour I have 21 zombies.. the good thing is they keep getting reset and keep right on hashing... but this can't be a good thing.... Kano, should I get and try your patch 3.2.1a? can I help add some more info....
The BLF and the GPU are fine and stable.
Naelr
Ok after zombies made my console go off the screen I stoped and restarted and almost instantly AMU 8 zombied and restarted.
|
|
|
|
TheOrri
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2013, 05:34:15 PM Last edit: June 07, 2013, 06:29:42 PM by TheOrri |
|
i used 3.2.1 but didn't recognize the usb asicminers. Perhaps because i use a usb 3.0 hub ?
Have the same problem. Followed all the steps. I'm on ubuntu 12.04. Edit: Never mind, It works ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) . However, I need to start cgminer and then restart it again in the menu, in order to detect the USB sticks. You might want to try that. Also, check if cgminer detects the USB miners without the hub. If so, the problem is probably in the hub.
|
|
|
|
|